|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 14:16:57 GMT -8
Oh I see. So Furare and Wrecker never PM'd you your results.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 14:17:45 GMT -8
Well my results are pretty obvious in the game thread aren't they?
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 14:19:08 GMT -8
True. Do you mind showing your outbox then? Cause I mean, we can ask and whatnot.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 14:23:42 GMT -8
|
|
Phoenix
Cabin Person
I come from the Land Down Under
Posts: 99
|
Post by Phoenix on Mar 2, 2013 14:24:13 GMT -8
Someone's lying to us.
Vote: Marinated
For now. Since with Crazy's claim that I now need to think about a bit more she's my highest suspicion.
Still reviewing Sets but still don't think he's a rogue.
|
|
|
Post by cala on Mar 2, 2013 14:27:25 GMT -8
Right now I don't know what to believe. Something somewhere doesn't ring true. I need to think.
Unvote: Crazymg
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 14:27:35 GMT -8
So. Do we take the risk and vote off Joly on the basis of someone is likely lying, or do we move to Cala?
|
|
|
Post by cala on Mar 2, 2013 14:28:31 GMT -8
Yeah Sets, lets vote me because we have noone else to
|
|
Phoenix
Cabin Person
I come from the Land Down Under
Posts: 99
|
Post by Phoenix on Mar 2, 2013 14:29:52 GMT -8
Why would Furare and Wrecker give two roles who can protect someone from a ban?
This is the question I can't get past.
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 14:31:33 GMT -8
Right?
I also don't understand why Crazy would wait until now to roleclaim. YesterDay she helps the town. ToDay she helps herself only.
|
|
|
Post by Luvessy on Mar 2, 2013 14:40:08 GMT -8
Proxy Vote for Jolyma: Cala
|
|
|
Post by Luvessy on Mar 2, 2013 14:41:19 GMT -8
Crazy, what does your role do when you target someone?
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 14:43:54 GMT -8
It protects them from bans.
Vote: Cala
|
|
|
Post by Luvessy on Mar 2, 2013 14:45:24 GMT -8
Does it block their action? Or only stop bans?
|
|
|
Post by cala on Mar 2, 2013 14:45:28 GMT -8
Wheeeeeee bandwagon time Someone is lying about their role, or lied about their role, and I sense someone is still not revealing something too. No big reveal from me, I have no role.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 14:48:07 GMT -8
Only stops bans.
|
|
|
Post by Luvessy on Mar 2, 2013 14:51:16 GMT -8
The counter to Crazy's role would be the supposed role blocker. I still don't fully understand DD's role.
|
|
|
Post by Marinated on Mar 2, 2013 15:07:35 GMT -8
I suspect DD's role classes as a daytime role which can't be blocked by a nighttime roleblocker. So unless the rogues have a day role blocker his last action should go through if he uses it tonight.
I don't understand Phoe's insistence that there are only four roles. Especially as the strongest investigative roles are not in use.
|
|
Phoenix
Cabin Person
I come from the Land Down Under
Posts: 99
|
Post by Phoenix on Mar 2, 2013 15:17:23 GMT -8
Oh for the love of....
Because with only 18 people in a role game - not a "role heavy" game - 4 is about as high as you'd want to go or it becomes boring as hell for the people who didn't roll Rogue and didn't roll a role since it then becomes a game played in the inbox of the mods as the role holders do stuff to the rogues and the rogues do stuff to the role holders and the roleless innocents get screwed over.
I don't think Furare and Wrecker would do that. Even removing the PWS and Medium.
|
|
Phoenix
Cabin Person
I come from the Land Down Under
Posts: 99
|
Post by Phoenix on Mar 2, 2013 15:23:06 GMT -8
Ok, Sets. Advanced notice, I'm having issues seeing straight. I need sleep, but if I sleep right now I'll be asleep for deadline and damnit I'm going to do this first! Current list of people I think could be/are rogues Taelac Phoenix Firebolt Riss Why do I appear on this list. You keep saying you're suspicious but you never say why. Started early too. So I started reading Bunny's posts and then I realized she had like a hundred of them or something. Imagine if I died and someone had to read my crap. I'm doing it while you're alive. And omg. And found nothing except the near constant "Going to look at Phoe" that never seems to come back with anything. You've had me as a voteable for Days and not really said why.
|
|
Phoenix
Cabin Person
I come from the Land Down Under
Posts: 99
|
Post by Phoenix on Mar 2, 2013 15:25:06 GMT -8
I give up. Leaving my vote where it is, going to go do something that isn't bloody ROMS.
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 15:30:21 GMT -8
The thing that bothers me is that Joly's claim is a good one for a rogue to make.
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 15:32:52 GMT -8
I still can't help but feel like Joly or Crazy is lying.
Furare and Wrecker could have given a rogue a fake role or something to offset the PM thing. It's too town sided otherwise and gamebreaky.
|
|
|
Post by Marinated on Mar 2, 2013 15:36:05 GMT -8
What puzzled me about Joly's claim is why she claimed at all. If her role was genuine it would have been better to keep silent and hope they tried to ban her.
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 15:39:43 GMT -8
Agreed.
I think I'm going to stop trying to understand what could be in the game. Also I suppose since I thought Joly's proxy was from DD, Luv has it. Which is cool and fine.
Luv, why are you so sure about Cala over anyone else?
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 15:46:26 GMT -8
So we're at
Mari: DD, Phoe (2) Cala: Crazy, Luv, Mari, Joly (4) Crazymg: Sets (1)
Not voting: Cala.
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 15:47:39 GMT -8
Vote: Marinated
|
|
|
Post by Marinated on Mar 2, 2013 15:49:41 GMT -8
Why?
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 15:51:02 GMT -8
Prefer to no lynch. Tie more likely.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 15:53:50 GMT -8
why do you want a no lynch?
|
|