|
Post by cala on Mar 2, 2013 12:44:05 GMT -8
And Luvs I just knew you were going to say that. I have been at work, its the weekend and my kids take presidence. Crazy has been up there on my list for the majority of the game, I am suspicious and I am going to vote where my suspicion is, and I believe she is a rogue.
|
|
|
Post by Luvessy on Mar 2, 2013 12:45:48 GMT -8
In any case, I think a lynch is better than no lynch.
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 12:48:22 GMT -8
Think about it strategically? Mathematically an inactivity is good for the rogues since it is most likely innocent. And yeah, fair enough. I voted Rose because I hadn't read the thread for awhile and simply, she hadn't been around, ironic as that is.
I think Crazy is the better lynch because Cala suspicion seems to be more of a product of what other people have done, external events whereas my suspicion on Crazy comes from what she's done, internal events if you will. Crazy's alignment would not change my stance on voting Cala tomorrow though. I admittedly am unsure about her status, but we're at the point where I need to co-operate with the people who I believe to be innocent and vote for the people they want lynched.
Crazy, you were rogue, Talisker and Twopatch were innocents. It was much clearer then that you were rogue than it is now, but you didn't do much except say "Yeah, end it". Forgive me if that action makes me think you'd fight harder to stay alive as a late game innocent than a late game rogue.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 13:02:40 GMT -8
Oh right. Stupid memory. I'm not a rogue this game! I haven't given up, i've just been hoping you'd realise i'm not rouge without too much prodding. Next post will be better from my laptop brb.
|
|
|
Post by Luvessy on Mar 2, 2013 13:03:33 GMT -8
Who to trust? The only one I feel real good about being innocent is DD. He's off voting for Marinated. Sets is likely innocent. Joly has said she blows up. It's an easy claim to make with no way to prove it, other than to kill her and see what happens. She said she was uneasy about Cala but went and voted for Crazy for having bad rogue strategy, best as I can parse it. Forgive me. I'm sick and thinking is foggy. Marinated I've been nervous about all game. I don't know what to think there, other than to believe she makes good points, some I agree with, some I don't. Phoenix is leaning innocent for me. I think she makes poor conclusions. Her last few posts have cheery picked quotes and dropped context. I don't think that makes her a rogue. Cala I think very well could be, and its not a critique of real life responsibilities. Please don't think I'm suggesting a re-prioritization. Crazy could be a rogue. But I think there's a bit of a fickle steamroller going for her at the moment, for reasons I'm not clear on. Innocent reasons, at least. If Cala is a rogue, Crazy is a logical lynch for the rogues. That said, she's had suspicion most the game and actively defended known rogues. So really, it's about the timing for me.
I think I got everyone there.
Later, gators.
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 13:09:40 GMT -8
Joly made her claim after we asked DD to show his PM. No way a rogue does that. (joly when u bak ken we c? :3)
For me, DD, Joly and I are CI. Luv I feel really good about. Looking over Marinated and Phoe made me feel better about them. Cala there just wasn't much there either way. I think Crazy is a rogue, maybe her and Cala are both rogues (who knows) but nonetheless, we have two or three Days before we lose, and I have two rogue candidates. Either I'm right and can help us win, or I'm wrong and am going to be fairly unhelpful to the innocent team.
|
|
Phoenix
Cabin Person
I come from the Land Down Under
Posts: 99
|
Post by Phoenix on Mar 2, 2013 13:17:27 GMT -8
So. Luvessy. Note: This is the post that I later was referring to as "mild roleplaying". Or was it not supposed to read as a news reporter? Ok here I'd like to say I'm at result 121 (Bottom up) of Luv's and that's the only thing I've found to comment on. Phoenix has jumped way up on my radar, partly due to my suspicions of Twopatch. Forgive me if you've forgotten why this was but huh? I jumped up your radar because you were suspicious of Twopatch? How'd that work? And that's all that drew my attention with Luv. Still think she's innocent. Phoe's List. Joly - Bomb - Innocent DD - Troublemaker - Innocent Cala - RI Phoenix - RI Crazy MG - Quite possibly Rogue. Marinated - Quite possibly Rogue. Luvessy - RI. Only Sets to go now. Whee!
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 13:18:29 GMT -8
I'm a security guard. Like I said earlier, for some reason that way didn't cross my mind, and I protected DD last night instead of Yasmi. This pretty much sums it up:
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 13:23:00 GMT -8
How does your role work, PM, blah blah blah, what have you done each night?
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 13:23:31 GMT -8
This PM thing is so broken I have no idea why Furare and Wrecker left it in the rules.
|
|
|
Post by cala on Mar 2, 2013 13:30:46 GMT -8
Be interested to know who you've been protecting each night as no bans have been stopped. Yasmi was useful to the town, why not have your protection there?
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 13:32:20 GMT -8
Also why would you not claim yesterDay when Yasmi and DD had their necks out and you could have assisted them by co-ordinating your role with theirs.
Why would DD have a protection role, and you have a doctor role?
|
|
|
Post by Marinated on Mar 2, 2013 13:37:35 GMT -8
This PM thing is so broken I have no idea why Furare and Wrecker left it in the rules. That's why I wondered if they had provided fake claims. So that we can't use anything from the roles to prove alignment.
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 13:39:23 GMT -8
I don't think they anticipated the inbox request. I mean, faking a PM is doable, faking an inbox would require mod assistance and a pre-emptive plan from game on to do so, or a bunch of time in photoshop.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 13:45:04 GMT -8
The first time I protect someone successfully neither of us is harmed, the second time, I would be killed. Night 1: Bunny Night 2: Marinated Night 3: Joly Night 4: Yasmi Night 5: Sets Night 6: DD PM and InboxWhen I test the links they're taking awhile to load, let me know if they don't work >.>
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 13:48:36 GMT -8
I was considering claiming yesterday, but decided against it.
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 13:49:52 GMT -8
Why did you decide against it.
|
|
|
Post by cala on Mar 2, 2013 13:52:10 GMT -8
To be fair you don't need photoshop to create a believable inbox. All you need to do is hit view source whilst looking at your pm box and use a text editor to modify the html. Quick and simple if someone knows what they are doing.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 13:54:38 GMT -8
I was just hesitant towards it. So I didn't.
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 13:55:12 GMT -8
There's just no way we have this many roles.
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 13:55:31 GMT -8
Hesitant towards doing what you could to help the town? I don't understand.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 13:57:29 GMT -8
I dislike roleclaiming.
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 14:00:40 GMT -8
So you have a role that protects someone, and yesterDay it would have been extremely useful, but because you dislike roleclaiming you decided to not utilize the tool that was available to you to help catch a rogue in a net of roleclaims.
Why?
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 14:06:45 GMT -8
Because I haven't spent enough time thinking about ROMS, because I started back at uni and that's more important.
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 14:08:21 GMT -8
Yeah I can't argue with that. Why delete all your PMs?
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 14:09:23 GMT -8
What?
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 14:10:13 GMT -8
You had four.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 14:10:27 GMT -8
and?
|
|
|
Post by Setsusa on Mar 2, 2013 14:12:30 GMT -8
Why did you delete the rest.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Mg on Mar 2, 2013 14:14:09 GMT -8
I showed you my INBOX, DD showed us his OUTBOX.
|
|